|
Post by hyemew on Apr 17, 2007 23:14:22 GMT -5
OK: 1. It's apparent Amanda/Miles (might) read here. 2. I think this SCANDAL calls for another milo-went blog! Tell the world about Julia's on-again off-again meta-sticness!
|
|
|
Post by oweniscool on Apr 18, 2007 0:59:40 GMT -5
Darling, I bet the closest you have come to Dumas is sneezing. I could find more culture in my fridge. mwahaha, we're mean. it's fun. I can't do this at LGPedia. OK: 1. It's apparent Amanda/Miles (might) read here. 2. I think this SCANDAL calls for another milo-went blog! Tell the world about Julia's on-again off-again meta-sticness! 1. Oops, sorry Amanda and the rest of the c's. it's not my fault that now it's on google cache for the entire world to see... 2. I second that!
|
|
|
Post by curiousgeorge on Apr 18, 2007 5:31:38 GMT -5
OK: 1. It's apparent Amanda/Miles (might) read here. No doubt about that Hye. I wonder if they have a whiteboard with all the various and sundry sockpuppets with associated passwords. Can you imagine how many they have for the phorum! I guess at this point they probably have so many it requires a database. OK: 2. I think this SCANDAL calls for another milo-went blog! Tell the world about Julia's on-again off-again meta-sticness! FLW came up with An Abundance of Brees but we also seem to have an Abundance of Canons. Several with sputtering fuses. Details matter Miles.
|
|
|
Post by oweniscool on Apr 18, 2007 17:55:51 GMT -5
Here's the cached google page: linkgah! now the cached google page doesn't show the comment either! it must have gotten buried under the other comments. I tried getting a new link, but no dice... anyone know how to get it? Some mysterious IP address has removed the mention of that comment on the LGPedia three times. I wish I had a link so I could prove it.
|
|
|
Post by hyemew on Apr 18, 2007 18:00:02 GMT -5
Milo we need you to blog into action and speak out about this conspiracy!
|
|
|
Post by legaldocket on Apr 18, 2007 18:46:57 GMT -5
Milo we need you to blog into action and speak out about this conspiracy! Yes!!!!
|
|
|
Post by milowent on Apr 18, 2007 18:58:55 GMT -5
OIC, i believe you, as I saw that comment also (i didn't know who callmejules24 was, but i noted it was a nice non-hater comment).
Somehow I don't see this as a blog-worthy controversy, however, at least not on its own!
ETA: Also Hye at least preserved a cut and paste of the actual comment in this thread. .... ah .... OK, I see you guys are noting that it was nikki b. who deleted the callmejules24 comment (since people can't delete their own comments on youtube, right). that helps prove jules is canon? is that why this is exciting?
|
|
|
Post by hyemew on Apr 21, 2007 11:02:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by oweniscool on Apr 21, 2007 14:33:17 GMT -5
LOL, Hye! He was NOT happy. "Please don't get me sent to jail, lonelygirl creators". I don't blame him. Not only is she jailbait, she's a blemish on his video replies--don't forget, her reply was the rapping video! ETA: Sorry I posted so much in a row, everybody! There was just a lot to comment on since the last time I left--I'll think more before replying to every thread...
|
|
|
Post by mku77 on Apr 21, 2007 21:01:15 GMT -5
Jules vids= grrrrrrehhhhhwww Try Again!
|
|