|
Post by wixy15 on Sept 6, 2006 5:09:16 GMT -5
Has there been cases of LG15 appearing in papers, news propgrammes etc outside of USA? I live in England and I haven't seen anything over here. It dosen't seem to be wel known at all here, none of my friends know anything about it.
|
|
|
Post by jayhenry on Sept 6, 2006 8:16:06 GMT -5
|
|
dd
Anchor Cove Resident
Posts: 27
|
Post by dd on Sept 6, 2006 8:20:44 GMT -5
Public photos will be the only way to beat them to the punch. I can't see the timesonline.co.uk photo. I think it's because of the commas in link. Can someone help?
-dd
|
|
|
Post by jayhenry on Sept 6, 2006 8:30:28 GMT -5
Just copy that whole link into your browser's address bar.
|
|
|
Post by milowent on Sept 6, 2006 8:38:23 GMT -5
|
|
gerald
Anchor Cove Resident
Posts: 32
|
Post by gerald on Sept 6, 2006 10:45:12 GMT -5
yep, was just about to post the one milowent posted
i love in aus:
the age is a victorian newspaper, the article isnt about LG15 but more some chick who lives up the cost.
the LG15 hasn't really hit australian shores, or atleast if it has im the only one i know who knows anything about it. no one at my school has heard about it unless ive told them.
thats all from aus
gerald
|
|
|
Post by typemonkey on Sept 7, 2006 0:02:22 GMT -5
I am a toal newbie to ths, and am trying to catch up. I read the times article where Bree mentions learning about Occam's Razor.
Occam's razor states that the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating, or "shaving off", those that make no difference in the observable predictions of the explanatory hypothesis or theory. In short, when given two equally valid explanations for a phenomenon, one should embrace the less complicated formulation.
Don't know what this means in the grand scheme of things, but thought it might be interesting.She also mentions the Treaty of Versailles...don't have a clue on that...
Forgive me if this so 'two weeks ago...' I'll catch up...
|
|
|
Post by jayhenry on Sept 7, 2006 15:46:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by johnnypanic13 on Sept 7, 2006 15:58:38 GMT -5
wtf!? is that satire?
"You heard it here first: Lonelygirl15 is actually a boy. And I think Daniel knows."
You can't end a article like that! Is there a "next page" link that I didn't see?
|
|
|
Post by wixy15 on Sept 7, 2006 16:03:48 GMT -5
Think she might have got a mention on Radio1 in England today at about lunch time. I just got in the car as they were finishing the item.
Not certain though
|
|
|
Post by milowent on Sept 7, 2006 16:05:33 GMT -5
That could explain the one-piece bathing suit -- to hide the chest hair. This isn't Blair Witch II, it's Crying Game 2!!
|
|
crackityjonesjr
Anchor Cove Resident
It's not about the girl, it's about the monkey
Posts: 34
|
Post by crackityjonesjr on Sept 7, 2006 16:23:03 GMT -5
A bad joke is what that is. Milo: You mean Blair Witch 3, don't you?
|
|
|
Post by kayleigh724 on Sept 7, 2006 16:24:34 GMT -5
wtf!? is that satire? "You heard it here first: Lonelygirl15 is actually a boy. And I think Daniel knows." You can't end a article like that! Is there a "next page" link that I didn't see? Seriously? It's clearly a joke. Look at it in context of the last paragraph: "All we need to give this micromeme a fitting conclusion is to prove that the three words within lonelygirl15's name are all lies. She's clearly not lonely, as more than 6,000 people have posted to her pages on YouTube. She's clearly not fifteen, as says in one of her first videos that she's actually sixteen. You heard it here first: Lonelygirl15 is actually a boy." They're saying her name is lonelygirl15 but she's not lonely and she's not 15 and... OMG I BET SHE'S NOT EVEN A GIRL IS SHE??? ... It's funny. But only a little.
|
|
|
Post by johnnypanic13 on Sept 7, 2006 16:28:23 GMT -5
okay... on the second read i get it.... ...sort of. *ug*
|
|
|
Post by lgsleuth on Sept 8, 2006 22:04:13 GMT -5
From this side of the pond we have a Guardian Article out today: tinyurl.com/nz963Bree, speak up. What have these "creators" previously done?? Are they speaking for you???
|
|